ArticleOphthalmology science
Risk of Retinal Vein Occlusion between Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential protective associations of antidiabetic and lipid-lowering therapies with retinal vein occlusion risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2026Review
- Beyond Glycemic Control: Ocular Effects of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Benefits and Risks of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Ocular Diseases: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Analogs Associated with a Reduced Risk of Legal Blindness in Type 2 Diabetics with Cardiovascular Risks.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Unraveling causal pathways in retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review of Mendelian randomization studies.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are associated with reduced retinal vein occlusion (RVO) risk compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Design: A multinational, retrospective cohort study. Participants: Adults with T2DM newly prescribed GLP-1RAs or DPP-4 inhibitors between 2006 and 2023 were included in our analysis. Methods: This study leveraged data from populations across 21 countries. Propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio balanced age, sex, race, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate, medications, and comorbidities between GLP-1RA and DPP4 inhibitor users. Main Outcomes Measures: We observed the occurrence of incident RVO and branch RVO (BRVO) in the overall population and in subpopulations stratified by age, sex, race, GLP-1RA type, baseline HbA1c, BMI, and diabetes duration. Results: Among 79 486 matched participants, GLP-1RA use is associated with a lower risk of RVO (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.98) and BRVO (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95) over 5 years compared with DPP-4 inhibitor use. This association is consistent among patients aged ≥50 years, Blacks, those prescribed human-analog GLP-1RAs, and those with baseline HbA1c ≥8%, BMI ≥30 kg/m Conclusions: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use was linked to reduced RVO and BRVO risks in patients with T2DM when compared with DPP-4 inhibitor use, particularly in high-risk populations, suggesting potential benefits of GLP-1RAs over DPP-4 inhibitors in managing ocular complications in T2DM. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.