Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206231›Full record

ArticleReumatologia2025

Polymorphisms of

Tana Svitalkova, Antonin Ambroz, Marketa Svetla, Martina Misunova, Libor Kolesar, Peter Novota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reumatologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tana SvitalkovaInstitute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Antonin AmbrozInstitute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marketa SvetlaInstitute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martina MisunovaInstitute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Libor KolesarInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Peter NovotaInstitute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of rare systemic autoimmune diseases characterized by muscle weakness, histopathological signs of inflammation in muscle tissues, elevated serum levels of muscle-associated enzymes, inflammatory mononuclear cells infiltrating muscle tissue and progressive symmetrical proximal muscle weakness. The current view is that they begin by immune activation in response to environmental factors in genetically predisposed people, but despite the number of investigations into the genetic background, the detailed etiopathogenesis remains unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between select polymorphisms located in the human major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and IIM. These genetic markers may take part in the onset of the autoimmune process, and their identification could aid in the diagnosis and classification of IIM subtypes. Material and methods: One hundred and fifty-two adult patients suffering from IIM (82 dermatomyositis and 70 polymyositis) and 150 healthy controls were analyzed in this study. All were from the Czech Republic. SNPs of the Results: Our results confirm the association of IIM with the ancestral haplotype HLA-DRB1*03-DQB1*02. The most important MHC haplotype related to IIM and covering all polymorphisms was HLA-DQB1*02-DRB1*03:01-T-C-C-G-C-INS ( Conclusions: Our results show that polymorphism typing within the MHC might be a very strong tool for recognition of IIM.

Indexed as

HSP70idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM)major histocompatibility complexpolymorphisms

Identifiers

PMID40206231
PMCPMC11977503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.