Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206208›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical imaging science2025

Magnetic resonance permeability for the evaluation of head and neck tumors: Parotid and beyond.

Stephanie Yuka Matwijszyn Nagano, Rubens Chojniak, Gislaine Cristina Lopes Machado Porto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical imaging science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie Yuka Matwijszyn NaganoDepartment of Imaging, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8918-4907
Rubens ChojniakDepartment of Imaging, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8918-4907
Gislaine Cristina Lopes Machado PortoDepartment of Imaging, A. C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-1983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck cancer is the seventh most common cancer globally, with over 300 thousand deaths annually. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of head and neck tumors is a well-known method for its evaluation, although malignant and benign imaging tumors often overlap. Permeability is an advanced method performed by MRI that assist in the diagnosis and evaluation of the neoplasm treatments, having a well-established role in some cases, such as salivary gland tumors, and promising in others, such as squamous cell carcinoma and lymph node evaluation. This pictorial review aims to demonstrate the diverse applications of magnetic resonance permeability imaging in head and neck tumors, highlighting its role in differentiating benign from malignant lesions, such as parotid gland tumors, assessing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and evaluating lymph node involvement. By correlating these advanced imaging findings with conventional magnetic resonance techniques, this review aims to enhance radiologists' understanding of the method and its clinical utility in improving diagnostic and treatment planning.

Indexed as

Carcinomashead and neckmagnetic resonance imagingoncologypermeability

Identifiers

PMID40206208
PMCPMC11980750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.