Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206193›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational immunology2025

Leveraging radiotherapy to improve immunotherapy outcomes: rationale, progress and research priorities.

Faith Hartley, Martin Ebert, Alistair M Cook

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Faith HartleyMedical School University of Western Australia Perth WA Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-7144
Martin EbertSchool of Physics Mathematics and Computing University of Western Australia Perth WA Australia.
Alistair M CookNational Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, Institute for Respiratory Health University of Western Australia Nedlands WA Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5339-5374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most successful immunotherapies for solid malignancies to date, immune checkpoint inhibitors, target the essential role of T cells in antitumor immunity. However, T-cell dysfunction presents a major hindrance to treatment efficacy, warranting research into combined treatment strategies for improving outcomes. The use of radiotherapy for this purpose has garnered much interest. Preclinical study has established that radiotherapy activates various immune mechanisms to improve T-cell activation, localisation and function within tumors, which improves response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, so far, these strategies have not been successfully translated into the clinic. Here, we briefly reflect on the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the mechanistic insights revealed by an evolving understanding of T-cell dysfunction in cancer, before providing an overview of the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy in the context of the T-cell-mediated antitumor immune response. We discuss the mixed results of clinical trials, comment on various factors that may preclude immuno-radiotherapy responses in the clinic, and highlight priorities for preclinical and clinical study. Finally, we discuss the role of emerging combinations of radiotherapy and immunotherapy to potentially provide additional treatment options and improve outcomes for patients.

Indexed as

immunotherapyradiotherapyT cellstranslational immunologytumor immunology

Identifiers

PMID40206193
PMCPMC11977402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.