ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Explainable AI-based feature importance analysis for ovarian cancer classification with ensemble methods.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep neural architecture empowered by explainable artificial intelligence for accurate and early diagnosis of gynaecological cancer using medical images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Research progress of artificial intelligence in the early screening, diagnosis, precise treatment and prognosis prediction of three central gynecological malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Recent therapeutic advances in gynecologic oncology: evolving roles of immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, and clinical trial innovations.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Ovarian Cancer (OC) is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths among women. Despite recent advances in the medical field, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy interventions, there are only marginal improvements in the diagnosis of OC using clinical parameters, as the symptoms are very non-specific at the early stage. Owing to advances in computational algorithms, such as ensemble machine learning, it is now possible to identify complex patterns in clinical parameters. However, these complex patterns do not provide deeper insights into prediction and diagnosis. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) models, such as LIME and SHAP Kernels, can provide insights into the decision-making process of ensemble models, thus increasing their applicability. Methods: The main aim of this study is to design a computer-aided diagnostic system that accurately classifies and detects ovarian cancer. To achieve this objective, a three-stage ensemble model and a game-theoretic approach based on SHAP values were built to evaluate and visualize the results, thus analyzing the important features responsible for prediction. Results and Discussion: The results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed model with an accuracy of 98.66%. The proposed model's consistency and advantages are compared with single classifiers. The SHAP values of the proposed model are validated using conventional statistical methods such as the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.