ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Decolonizing global health research: experiences from the women in health and their economic, equity and livelihood statuses during emergency preparedness and response (WHEELER) study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging global diversity gaps in Parkinson disease research.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decolonizing global health research involves rethinking power structures and research collaboration to prioritize the voices and experiences of communities that have been historically marginalized. Cross-sectoral and cross-regional partnerships based on reciprocity, trust, and transparency can be facilitated by decolonized research frameworks. To address global health issues in a way that is inclusive, context-specific, and genuinely advantageous to all parties involved, especially communities most impacted by health disparities, the ethics behind this change is imperative. We applied a decolonizing health research approach to the Women in Health and their Economic, Equity, and Livelihood Statuses During Emergency Preparedness and Response (WHEELER) study to explore the connections between gender, health, and economic equity in times of crisis in two counties in Kenya. This paper outlines seven key dimensions that guided the WHEELER study in transforming power dynamics in research, decolonizing research processes, and fostering equitable partnerships. The study employed participatory methodologies, integrating the Equity in Partnership instrument from the Canadian Coalition for Global Health Research (CCGHR) Principles, human-centered design (HCD), and gender-based analysis to ensure inclusivity, gender sensitivity, and active participation. The participatory approach was implemented through the engagement of a Community Research Advisory Group (CRAG) and a Local Advisory Board (LAB). Utilizing mixed methods and community-engaged processes, the study fostered reciprocal growth, learning, and change among local health officials and research teams. Our participatory approach fostered strengthened engagement, promoted shared decision-making, and enhanced the sense of ownership among policy implementers throughout the research process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.