ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Association between household solid fuel use and cognitive frailty in a middle-aged and older Chinese population.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Household solid fuel use increases frailty risk in Chinese middle-aged and older adults: a prospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ambient ammonium exposure is associated with physical dysfunction in older adults in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exposure to indoor wood smoke, rather than hypoxemia, is a risk factor for cognitive impairment in COPD patients living at high altitude.Chronic respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Our research intended to investigate the association between the solid fuels use and the risk of cognitive frailty (CF). Methods: The research utilized data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), a nationwide longitudinal study focusing on individuals aged 45 and older. A total of 8,563 participants without CF were enrolled from 2011 and followed up to 2015. Household fuel types include solid fuels (such as coal, crop residue, or wood-burning) and clean fuels (such as solar power, natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas, electricity, or marsh gas). CF was defined as the co-existence of cognitive impairment and physical frailty. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate the relationship between the solid fuels use and the risk of CF. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Over a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 131 subjects were diagnosed with CF. We observed that the solid fuels use for cooking or heating increased the risk of developing CF compared to clean fuels, with HRs of 2.02 (95% CI: 1.25 to 3.25) and 2.38 (95% CI: 1.26 to 4.48), respectively. In addition, participants who use solid fuel for heating (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.26, 4.48]) and cooking (HR: 2.02 [95% CI: 1.25, 3.25]) might experience an increased risk of CF. However, transitioning from solid to clean fuels for cooking could potentially reduce these risks (HR: 0.38 [95% CI: 0.16, 0.88]). Conclusion: Household solid fuels utilization was closely associated with the risk of CF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.