Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206124›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024

Organizing Virtual Care, Digital Services Replacing Hospital In-Care and Outpatient Care.

Wim van Harten, Carine Doggen, Laura Kooij

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wim van HartenDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Carine DoggenDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Laura KooijScience Department, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital-based digital care and virtual care are becoming increasingly common and their reach and scope are expanding in terms of patient groups and technological sophistication. The objective of this viewpoint is to provide guidance on design and factors that can be decisive for the organization of virtual care from a hospital's perspective. Relevant aspects to be taken into account are as follows: characteristics of the technology, in a broader sense, the nature and intensity of provider involvement and supervision, the degree of self-management by the patient and his environment, the relation and cooperation mechanisms with other providers as home care, general practitioner 's and other specialist care, the matter of (economies of) scale and finally the uniformity of processes over geographic regions and providers. We provide suggestions for further research and future policy related to these aspects.

Identifiers

PMID40206124
PMCPMC11975975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.