Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206122›Full record

ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024

Remote, Smart Device-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot, Randomized Cross-Over SmartRehab Study.

Peter Wohlfahrt, Dominik Jenča, Vojtěch Melenovský, Jolana Mrázková, Marek Šramko, Martin Kotrč, Michael Želízko, Věra Adámková, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, Jan Piťha and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03926312 (Smart Device-based Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03926312 nacompletednot on this map

Smart Device-based Cardiac Rehabilitation After Myocardial Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2019 to 2023Enrolled64ConditionsMyocardial InfarctionArmsSmart device-based cardiac rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peter WohlfahrtDepartment of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dominik JenčaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vojtěch MelenovskýDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jolana MrázkováExperimental Medicine Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marek ŠramkoDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin KotrčDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Michael ŽelízkoDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Věra AdámkováDepartment of Preventive Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Francisco Lopez-JimenezDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
Jan PiťhaDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Josef KautznerDepartment of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of smart device-based telerehabilitation on Vo Patients and Methods: This was a pilot, single-center, randomized, cross-over study with a 3-month intervention. One month after myocardial infarction, patients had cardiopulmonary exercise testing and a 6-minute walking test (6MWT) and were randomly assigned 1:1. In the intervention group, patients received a smartwatch to track the recommended number of steps, which was individualized and derived from the 6MWT. A study nurse telemonitored adherence to the recommended number of steps a day. In the control group, 150 minutes a week of moderate-intensity physical activity was recommended. After 3 months study arms were crossed over, and study procedures were repeated after 3 months. Results: Between June 1, 2019, and February 28, 2023, 64 patients were randomized, of which 61 (aged 51±10 years, 10% women) completed the study. Overall, the smart device-based telerehabilitation led to 2.31 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 1.25-3.37; Conclusion: Smart device-based cardiac rehabilitation may be a promising alternative for patients unable or unwilling to attend in-person cardiac rehabilitation. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03926312.

Identifiers

PMID40206122
PMCPMC11975814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.