ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
Economic Perspective of the Use of Wearables in Health Care: A Systematic Review.
Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Wearable Sweat Biosensors for Inflammatory Biomarkers (CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α): A Systematic Review of Analytical and Clinical Evidence.Biosensors · 2026Pooled it
- Advancements in Wearable Sensor Technologies for Health Monitoring in Terms of Clinical Applications, Rehabilitation, and Disease Risk Assessment: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Pooled it
- Wearable-Based Monitoring of Autonomic and Gastrointestinal Function in Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Pooled it
- Perceptions of care home residents, families and staff about wearable devices: a scoping review.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Increasing Use of Wearable Devices for Health or Activity Tracking Among Adults with Chronic Diseases in the US.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2026Article
- Reliability and Safety of Smartwatch Blood Pressure and Oxygen Saturation Measurements in Older Adults: Instrument Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Remote Monitoring With a Reusable Device Upon Implementation on a Surgical Department (REQUEST Trial).World journal of surgery · 2026Observational
- Evaluating a Wearable-Based Pain Monitoring System in Palliative Cancer Care: Usability and Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Observational
- A Multimodal System for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Monitoring Using ECG, PCG, and PPG Signal Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Wearable Devices in Healthcare Beyond the One-Size-Fits All Paradigm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Wearables in Healthcare Organizations: Implications for Occupational Health, Organizational Performance, and Economic Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep learning approach for automatic assessment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in patients using R-R intervals.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Patient Experience of Virtual Hospital Care Provided by a Multidisciplinary Team: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Disparities in the Field of Precision Medicine: A Perspective.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing Connected Health Ecosystems Through IoT-Enabled Monitoring Technologies: A Case Study of the Monit4Healthy System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of virtual emergency care models: A protocol for a systematic review.PloS one · 2025Article
- The Value of Smartwatches in the Health Care Sector for Monitoring, Nudging, and Predicting: Viewpoint on 25 Years of Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- A Comprehensive Review on Harnessing Wearable Technology for Enhanced Depression Treatment.Cureus · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to explore the current state of research concerning the cost-effectiveness of wearable health technologies, excluding hearing aids, owing to extensive previous investigation. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to search studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of wearable health devices in terms of quality-adjusted life years and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The search was conducted on March 28, 2023, and the date of publication did not limit the search. The search yielded 10 studies eligible for inclusion. These studies, published between 2012 and 2023, spanned various locations globally. The studies used data from hypothetical cohorts, existing research, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses. They covered a diverse range of wearable technologies applied in different health care settings, including respiratory rate monitors, pedometers, fall-prediction devices, hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention monitors, seizure detection devices, heart rate monitors, insulin therapy sensors, and wearable cardioverter defibrillators. The time horizons in the cost-effectiveness analyses ranged from less than a year to a lifetime. The studies indicate that wearable technologies can increase quality-adjusted life years and be cost-effective and potentially cost-saving. However, the cost-effectiveness depends on various factors, such as the type of device, the health condition being addressed, the specific perspective of the health economic analysis, local cost and payment structure, and willingness-to-pay thresholds. The use of wearables in health care promises improving outcomes and resource allocation. However, more research is needed to fully understand the long-term benefits and to strengthen the evidence base for health care providers, policymakers, and patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.