ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
Voice Analysis and Neural Networks as a Clinical Decision Support System for Patients With Lung Diseases.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the voice of patients with lung diseases, compared with healthy individuals, to detect patterns capable of assessing dyspnea using artificial neural networks (ANNs). Patients and Methods: This research consists of a cross-sectional prospective pilot study performed in a reference tertiary center, which included a group of patients with lung diseases, compared with a group of healthy individuals. Each patient's voice was recorded in controlled rooms. The following techniques were applied to extract and select signals' features: statistical analysis, fast Fourier transform, discrete wavelet transform and Mel-Cepstral analysis. In addition, data augmentation was used to avoid overfitting and improve the ANNs accuracy. Results: A total of 195 voices were recorded: 131 from lung disease patients and 64 from healthy individuals, separated according to gender and age. Using data augmentation, 751 additional audio samples were generated: 501 from healthy individuals and 445 from patients with lung disease. Among male participants, 133 samples were related to lung diseases and 197 were related to healthy ones. From them, 264 audios were used for ANNs training, obtaining an accuracy of 89%. In the female group, 312 had lung diseases and 304 were healthy. Among them, 492 audios were used for training, resulting in an accuracy of 87.6%. Conclusion: Spectral analysis techniques applied to voice recordings using ANNs have reported high accuracy in the efficient diagnosis of lung diseases when compared with healthy individuals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.