ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
Staff Experiences Transitioning to Digital Dermatopathology in a Tertiary Academic Medical Center: Lessons Learned From Implementation Science.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital pathology (DP) transforms practice by replacing traditional glass slide review with digital whole slide images and workflows. Although digitization may improve accuracy and efficiency, transitioning to digital practice requires staff to learn new skills and adopt new ways of working and collaborating. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the experiences and perceptions of individuals involved in the day-to-day work of implementing DP in a tertiary academic medical center using Normalization Process Theory, a social theory that explains the processes by which innovations are operationalized and sustained in practice. Between September 2021 and June 2022, dermatopathologists, referring clinicians, and support staff at Mayo Clinic (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona) participated in interviews (n=22) and completed surveys (n=34) concerning the transition. Normalization Process Theory informed the selection of validated survey items (Normalization Measure Development Questionnaire) and guided qualitative analysis. Participants reported high agreement with statements related to shared understanding and potential value of DP for workflow integration and working relationships. Qualitative themes reflecting the way organization and social context enable these processes were mapped onto implementation stages and related key activities. We found that earlier processes of implementation (understanding and working out participation) were better supported than later stages (doing it and reflecting on it). Our analysis helps identify targets for further intervention to hasten and help sustain implementation, including additional support in software and technological integration, workflows and work redesign, and regular monitoring and feedback systems. The use of implementation theory, such as Normalization Process Theory, may provide useful pointers to enable other similar digital system transition efforts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.