ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health2024
Electrocardiogram Signal Analysis With a Machine Learning Model Predicts the Presence of Pulmonary Embolism With Accuracy Dependent on Embolism Burden.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Electrocardiogram Analysis for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Integration of ECG and Molecular Biomarkers in Pulmonary Embolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- External validation of a commercial AI system for pulmonary embolism detection on chest CTPA: a multicenter study.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven electrocardiogram analysis for risk stratification in pulmonary embolism.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- QTc Prolongation as a Diagnostic Clue in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Screening for RV Dysfunction Using Smartphone ECG Analysis App: Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an artificial intelligence deep neural network (AI-DNN) algorithm to analyze 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) for detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and PE categories. Patients and Methods: A cohort of patients seen between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2020, from across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise with computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) and ECG performed ±6 hours was identified. Natural language processing algorithms were applied to radiology reports to determine the diagnosis of acute PE, acute right ventricular strain pulmonary embolism (RVSPE), saddle pulmonary embolism (SADPE), or no PE. Diagnostic performance parameters of the AI-DNN reported were area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: A cohort of patients with CTPA report and ECG consisted of 79,894 patients including 7423 (9.3%) with acute PE, among whom 1138 patients had RVSPE or SADPE. Artificial intelligence deep neural network predicted acute PE with a modest accuracy of AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68-0.71), sensitivity of 63.5%, specificity of 64.7%, PPV of 15.6%, and NPV of 94.5%. The AI-DNN prediction using the same algorithm for RVSPE or SADPE was higher (AUROC, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.86) with a sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 64.7.8%, PPV of 3.5%, and NPV of 99.5%. Conclusion: An AI-based analysis of 12-lead ECG shows modest detection power for acute PE in patients who underwent CTPA, with higher accuracy for high-risk PE. Moreover, with the high NPV, it has the clinical potential to exclude high-risk PE quickly and correctly.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.