Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40206096›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2025

Correlation between oral microbiota and dry socket at different time periods on tooth extraction.

Yujia Wu, Hujie Lyu, Xuliang Deng, Yong-Xin Liu, Ying He, Mingming Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yujia WuDepartment of Geriatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Laboratory of Biomedical Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1172-6459
Hujie LyuGenome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0518-7885
Xuliang DengDepartment of Geriatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Laboratory of Biomedical Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1838-6274
Yong-Xin LiuGenome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1832-9835
Ying HeDepartment of Geriatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Laboratory of Biomedical Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, P. R. China.
Mingming XuDepartment of Geriatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices, Beijing Laboratory of Biomedical Materials, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8594-0048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dry socket is a common post-extraction complication, characterized by the exposure of bone surfaces to the oral environment, leading to severe pain and potential infection. This study investigates the relationship between oral microbial composition and dry socket incidence in tooth extraction patients. Methods: From 87 patients (56 normal healing, 31 dry socket), 321 microbial samples were collected at pre-, med-, and post-extraction stages from saliva and the extraction sites, and all information was documented. All samples underwent 16S rDNA sequencing and amplicon analysis. Results: Dry socket patients exhibited distinct oral microbial diversity and composition. Conclusion:

Indexed as

16S rDNA sequencingdry socketmicrobial networkOral microbiotarandom forest

Identifiers

PMID40206096
PMCPMC11980198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.