Trial reportInternational journal of population data science2024
Evaluating the "right@home" randomized trial of nurse home visiting using linked administrative data at school transition.
Trial report in International journal of population data science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Follow-up study on the long-term effectiveness of the home-visiting program "ProKind": study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nurse home visiting (NHV) is designed to redress child and maternal health inequities, but long-term evaluation is hampered by sample attrition. Evaluation using administrative data has the potential to overcome attrition through provision of a more complete outcome profile. Australia's "right@home" trial is the only long-running evaluation of NHV designed for a population with universal healthcare. Objectives: To investigate the effects of the NHV program on children's health and development outcomes and service use, compared with usual care (comparator), using linked administrative data at school transition. Methods: A screening survey identified pregnant women experiencing adversity from antenatal clinics across two states (Victoria, Tasmania). 722 were randomized: 363 to the right@home program (25 visits promoting parenting and home learning environment) and 359 to usual care. At children's first birthdays, 198/237 (83.5%) Tasmanian and 420/485 (86.6%) Victorian parents consented to data linkage with the Tasmanian Kindergarten Development Check (KDC, 4 years) and Victorian School Entrant Health Questionnaire (SEHQ, 5-6 years), respectively. Jurisdictional differences meant measures could not be harmonized, and variables varied in their interpretability. Following best-practice methods for managing missing data, outcomes were compared between groups (intention-to-treat) using regression models adjusted for stratification factors, baseline variables, and nurse/site cluster. Results: Linked data were obtained for n = 134/237 (56.5%) Tasmanian and n = 252/485 (52.0%) Victorian children. These children had substantially higher prevalence of negative life events and poorer health and development outcomes, and used similar or more services than children state-wide. Compared with usual care, the NHV program increased KDC achievement and SEHQ health service use. There was less evidence for program impacts on SEHQ outcomes. Conclusions: Benefits of NHV were evident at school transition for child development outcomes and service use. This adds further evidence for NHV being an important component of universal health services that deliver support responsive to families' needs. Registration: ISRCTN89962120.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.