Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40205929›Full record

ReviewPathologica2025

Foetal cardiac rhabdomyoma due to paternal

Eleonora Nardi, Angela Silvano, Oumaima Ammar, Francesca Gensini, Annabella Marozza, Lucia Pasquini, Francesca Castiglione, Viola Seravalli

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eleonora NardiDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Pathology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Angela SilvanoDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Oumaima AmmarDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Francesca GensiniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Annabella MarozzaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', Medical Genetics Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lucia PasquiniDepartment for Women and Child Health, Fetal Medicine Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Francesca CastiglioneUnit of Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Viola SeravalliDepartment of Health Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhabdomyomas are the most common prenatal cardiac tumours, and are often associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). They have been shown to grow during foetal development, but may often regress or shrink in early childhood. In the present case, ultrasonography at 20+2 gestational weeks identified two echogenic masses suspicious of rhabdomyomas in the foetal heart. Neither of these tumours caused significant haemodynamic instability. Genetic testing of DNA extracted from amniocytes revealed a pathogenic variant of the Further research and a multidisciplinary approach are highly recommended to improve management and outcomes of prenatal tumours.

Indexed as

Heart NeoplasmsRhabdomyomaTuberous SclerosisTuberous Sclerosis Complex 1 ProteinFemaleHumansMutationPregnancyUltrasonography, PrenatalYoung AdultTSC1 protein, humanTuberous Sclerosis Complex 1 Proteingeneticshistologyrhabdomyoma,cardiac tumourstuberous sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID40205929
PMCPMC11983078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.