ArticleAustralian occupational therapy journal2025
Differences in personality and character traits of occupational therapy researchers and non-researchers: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Australian occupational therapy journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Differences in personality and character traits of occupational therapy researchers and non-researchers: A cross-sectional study.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite a high level of interest in research, many occupational therapists are not engaged in research activities. Understanding how occupational therapists' personality and character traits influence research engagement is crucial to designing effective research capacity building strategies. This study aimed to identify and compare personality and character traits of occupational therapy researchers and non-researchers across Australia.
methodsAn exploratory cross-sectional study was conducted using modified versions of the Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, eXtraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience Personality Inventory-Revised-60 (HEXACO-PI-R-60) and the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths-72 (VIA-IS-72) questionnaires. Differences in personality and character traits between researchers and non-researchers and correlations with research engagement were explored. Factor analysis was used to test the psychometric properties of the modified questionnaires.
resultsForty-seven researchers and 78 non-researchers participated in the online survey. There were significant differences between groups for traits of love of learning (P = 0.01), curiosity (P = 0.03), and creativity (P = 0.02). These traits were significantly associated with research engagement. Participants in the non-researcher group scored higher for traits of perfectionism and organisation; however, the results were not statistically significant. Factor analysis demonstrated that the modified personality questionnaires achieved similar psychometric properties and factor matrixes compared to the original versions.
conclusionOccupational therapists' research engagement is influenced by their personality and character traits, specifically love of learning, curiosity, and creativity. It is, therefore, imperative to consider intrinsic values when developing future research capacity building strategies to increase research engagement and support professional practice. CONSUMER AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Clinicians were involved in the development stage with five clinicians providing feedback on the survey tool. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Research is like being a detective. You start with something you want to learn more about, or a problem you want to solve, like a mystery. Researchers uncover new knowledge through gathering clues, people's opinions, and other types of information. They put it all together to find answers. Clinical research can help health professionals, like occupational therapists, find answers to understand the types of treatments that will help their clients the most. The issue is, many occupational therapists do not know how to do research and often do not do it. In our study, we wanted to understand why this is. We found out that if an occupational therapist has a love of learning, curiosity, and creativity, they are more likely to be interested in doing research. We plan to use our findings to develop research strategies that can help occupational therapists undertake more research, because research and new knowledge helps the therapist, their workplace and their clients. In the future, we aim to design research activities that engage therapists' love of learning, curiosity, and creativity. Because after all, a little bit of detective work done collaboratively can go a long way to improving care and the wider health-care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.