ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Trends in gabapentinoid prescribing: A nationwide Danish drug utilization study.
Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Use of prescribed analgesics before and after a standardised chiropractic care programme among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a nationwide cohort study.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Article
- Prescription Trends and Clinical Decision-Making in Neuropathic Pain Pharmacological Treatment: Results From a Cross-Sectional Survey by the Spanish Pain Society.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Article
- Trends and Guideline Adherence in Gabapentinoid Use among Geriatric Outpatients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study at a Falls Clinic.Drugs & aging · 2026Article
- Patterns and Characteristics of Gabapentin Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries.Drugs & aging · 2025Article
- Trends in gabapentinoid prescribing: A nationwide Danish drug utilization study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Incident gabapentin prescribing associated with opioid and benzodiazepine/Z-drug prescribing - a population-based longitudinal study in primary care.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsPregabalin and gabapentin are increasingly used for pain and other conditions. Concerns exist about overuse as well as potential misuse and abuse. To guide rational prescribing practices, we provide detailed nationwide data on the use of gabapentinoids in Denmark.
methodsWe conducted a nationwide descriptive drug utilization study using the Danish healthcare registries to describe the use of gabapentinoids among Danish adults 2010-2023. We described overall use patterns, temporal trends, user characteristics, skewness of use, treatment duration and concomitant medication use.
resultsThe prevalence of gabapentinoid use increased almost four-fold from 11 per 1000 adults in 2010 to 41 in 2023 with the highest use among individuals aged 80+ years (96 per 1000 in 2023). Gabapentin and pregabalin were used equally. The median age of users increased from 58 years in 2010 to 63 years in 2023, while a decline was observed in the proportion with concomitant use of other drug classes, including benzodiazepines or opioids. Only 7% of patients were continuously treated for 3 years following initiation, while 22% were currently treated after 3 years (allowing treatment breaks). The use of gabapentinoids were somewhat skewed with 1% of users accounting for 7.3% of use in 2023.
conclusionThe use of gabapentinoids has increased dramatically in recent years, in particular, among the elderly, and adherence was low. Increased attention to the increasing use of gabapentinoids is warranted to ensure rational use of this drug class.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.