SynthesisBJU international2025
Radical cystectomy mortality in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BJU international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Radical cystectomy in octogenarians: a propensity score-matched analysis of short-term outcomes.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Analysis of real-world re-induction outcomes with nadofaragene firadenovec in patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Chronological and biological age stratify survival after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a pragmatic age-ECOG risk score.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Article
- The 2025 paradigm shift in urothelial carcinoma pharmacotherapy: from chemotherapy to ADCs and ICIs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of post-radical cystectomy (RC) mortality and complications in older people to aid decision-making pertinent to RC, as bladder cancer is typically a disease of older people, yet older people are less likely than their younger peers to undergo RC, predominantly due to concerns about morbidity and mortality of surgery. MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus and Ovid Emcare was performed in May 2023 for all studies in the past 20 years that reported mortality and/or complications in the 90-days following RC. All studies reporting mortality or complication outcomes in patient groups aged >75 years were included. Exclusion criteria included partial, or organ-sparing cystectomy, non-English language articles, and <20 patients aged >75 years.
resultsA total of 76 studies were included, with data from 58 504 older patients across five continents and 19 countries. Post-RC 90-day mortality was 11% in studies reporting outcomes for patients aged ≥80 years, and 7% in studies of patients aged ≥75 years. The 90-day mortality was higher in patients aged ≥80 years compared to patients aged <80 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-7.22). Older people were more likely to experience a minor (Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II) postoperative complication than younger patients (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36), whereas there was no difference for major complications (Clavien-Dindo Garde III-IV; OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63-1.60). A higher co-morbid status was more strongly correlated with 90-day mortality in older patients than in younger patients.
conclusionsOlder patients face higher postoperative mortality following RC than younger patients. Postoperative outcomes should be weighed against the high risk of cancer-specific death if no curative treatment is offered. Older people must be monitored closely postoperatively to try and prevent death as a result of escalation from minor and major complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.