Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40205642›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Improving dose delivery in non-coplanar cranial SRS: Stereoscopic x-ray-guided mitigation of table walkout errors.

Yohan A Walter, Philip F Durham, Anne N Hubbard, William E Burrell, Hsinshun T Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yohan A WalterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3758-9093
Philip F DurhamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
Anne N HubbardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
William E BurrellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.
Hsinshun T WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Cancer Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLinear accelerator (LINAC)-based single-isocenter multi-target (SIMT) treatment has streamlined the cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) workflow. Though efficient, SIMT delivery adds additional challenges that should be considered, including increased sensitivity to rotational errors for off-isocenter targets. Room-mounted imaging systems carry the advantage of allowing fast, low-dose imaging at nonzero couch angles, which may combat the effects of table walkout and residual rotational errors. Here, we performed a series of end-to-end tests to determine if these corrections correlate with a measurable difference in delivered dose and to assess the overall accuracy of SIMT delivery on our LINAC-based SRS platform.

methodsTen treatment plans of increasing complexity were created in the Elements 4.0 treatment planning system (TPS, Brainlab AG). Plans were delivered on an Elekta Versa HD LINAC (Elekta AB) with the ExacTrac (ETX) imaging system (Brainlab AG). A CT scan of a StereoPHAN with SRS MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear) was imported into the TPS. Measured targets were contoured on the detector plane. Plans used 4-15 treatment arcs and 4-6 couch angles. ETX was used for initial phantom positioning. Dose measurements were performed for each plan with and without ETX-guided corrections at all table angles.

resultsTranslational and rotational residual shifts were all submillimeter and ≤1.0 degrees, respectively, across all table angles. Using 3.0%/1.0 mm gamma criteria, all gamma pass rates (GPR) were either equal or improved when ETX shifts were executed, though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.076). However, using 2.0%/0.5 mm criteria, GPR improved significantly (p = 0.016) with ETX repositioning. The average GPR improvement was 4.5% ± 4.8%.

conclusionsResults demonstrate that repositioning corrections at each table angle improve agreement between planned and delivered dose at the submillimeter level. The test treatment plans in this study may be used for assessment of end-to-end treatment delivery accuracy for complex LINAC-based stereotactic radiotherapy procedures.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsPatient PositioningPhantoms, ImagingRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansOrgans at RiskParticle AcceleratorsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedTomography, X-Ray Computedlinear acceleratorQASRSstereotactic radiation therapystereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID40205642
PMCPMC12148762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.