ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Improving dose delivery in non-coplanar cranial SRS: Stereoscopic x-ray-guided mitigation of table walkout errors.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical implementation of a multifaceted quality assurance phantom for high-precision radiation therapy: an institutional experience.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Improving dose delivery in non-coplanar cranial SRS: Stereoscopic x-ray-guided mitigation of table walkout errors.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLinear accelerator (LINAC)-based single-isocenter multi-target (SIMT) treatment has streamlined the cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) workflow. Though efficient, SIMT delivery adds additional challenges that should be considered, including increased sensitivity to rotational errors for off-isocenter targets. Room-mounted imaging systems carry the advantage of allowing fast, low-dose imaging at nonzero couch angles, which may combat the effects of table walkout and residual rotational errors. Here, we performed a series of end-to-end tests to determine if these corrections correlate with a measurable difference in delivered dose and to assess the overall accuracy of SIMT delivery on our LINAC-based SRS platform.
methodsTen treatment plans of increasing complexity were created in the Elements 4.0 treatment planning system (TPS, Brainlab AG). Plans were delivered on an Elekta Versa HD LINAC (Elekta AB) with the ExacTrac (ETX) imaging system (Brainlab AG). A CT scan of a StereoPHAN with SRS MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear) was imported into the TPS. Measured targets were contoured on the detector plane. Plans used 4-15 treatment arcs and 4-6 couch angles. ETX was used for initial phantom positioning. Dose measurements were performed for each plan with and without ETX-guided corrections at all table angles.
resultsTranslational and rotational residual shifts were all submillimeter and ≤1.0 degrees, respectively, across all table angles. Using 3.0%/1.0 mm gamma criteria, all gamma pass rates (GPR) were either equal or improved when ETX shifts were executed, though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.076). However, using 2.0%/0.5 mm criteria, GPR improved significantly (p = 0.016) with ETX repositioning. The average GPR improvement was 4.5% ± 4.8%.
conclusionsResults demonstrate that repositioning corrections at each table angle improve agreement between planned and delivered dose at the submillimeter level. The test treatment plans in this study may be used for assessment of end-to-end treatment delivery accuracy for complex LINAC-based stereotactic radiotherapy procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.