Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40205603›Full record

SynthesisJournal of translational medicine2025

Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of malignant digestive tract tumors: focusing on opportunities and challenges in endoscopy and pathology.

Yinhu Gao, Peizhen Wen, Yuan Liu, Yahuang Sun, Hui Qian, Xin Zhang, Huan Peng, Yanli Gao, Cuiyu Li, Zhangyuan Gu and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yinhu Gao *Department of Gastroenterology, Shaanxi Province Rehabilitation Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Peizhen Wen *Department of General Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China. wenpeizhen1996@163.com.
Yuan Liu *Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yahuang Sun *Division of Colorectal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Hui QianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Xin ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Huan PengDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Yanli GaoInfection Control Office, Shaanxi Province Rehabilitation Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Cuiyu LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of Nanchang, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330008, Jiangxi, China.
Zhangyuan GuTongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.
Huajin ZengDepartment of General Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China.
Zhijun HongTongji University School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China.
Weijun WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China. 610207494@qq.com.
Ronglin YanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China. yanronglin@smmu.edu.cn.
Zunqi HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China. xiaoqiyhe@163.com.
Hongbing FuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Navy Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, China. fuhongbing@smmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province 2023-YBSF-053National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070620National Natural Science Foundation of China 82400774
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalignant digestive tract tumors are highly prevalent and fatal tumor types globally, often diagnosed at advanced stages due to atypical early symptoms, causing patients to miss optimal treatment opportunities. Traditional endoscopic and pathological diagnostic processes are highly dependent on expert experience, facing problems such as high misdiagnosis rates and significant inter-observer variations. With the development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies such as deep learning, real-time lesion detection with endoscopic assistance and automated pathological image analysis have shown potential in improving diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, relevant applications still face challenges including insufficient data standardization, inadequate interpretability, and weak clinical validation.

objectiveThis study aims to systematically review the current applications of artificial intelligence in diagnosing malignant digestive tract tumors, focusing on the progress and bottlenecks in two key areas: endoscopic examination and pathological diagnosis, and to provide feasible ideas and suggestions for subsequent research and clinical translation.

methodsA systematic literature search strategy was adopted to screen relevant studies published between 2017 and 2024 from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore, supplemented with searches of early classical literature. Inclusion criteria included studies on malignant digestive tract tumors such as esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, or colorectal cancer, involving the application of artificial intelligence technology in endoscopic diagnosis or pathological analysis. The effects and main limitations of AI diagnosis were summarized through comprehensive analysis of research design, algorithmic methods, and experimental results from relevant literature.

resultsIn the field of endoscopy, multiple deep learning models have significantly improved detection rates in real-time polyp detection, early gastric cancer, and esophageal cancer screening, with some commercialized systems successfully entering clinical trials. However, the scale and quality of data across different studies vary widely, and the generalizability of models to multi-center, multi-device environments remains to be verified. In pathological analysis, using convolutional neural networks, multimodal pre-training models, etc., automatic tissue segmentation, tumor grading, and assisted diagnosis can be achieved, showing good scalability in interactive question-answering. Nevertheless, clinical implementation still faces obstacles such as non-uniform data standards, lack of large-scale prospective validation, and insufficient model interpretability and continuous learning mechanisms.

conclusionArtificial intelligence provides new technological opportunities for endoscopic and pathological diagnosis of malignant digestive tract tumors, achieving positive results in early lesion identification and assisted decision-making. However, to achieve the transition from research to widespread clinical application, data standardization, model reliability, and interpretability still need to be improved through multi-center joint research, and a complete regulatory and ethical system needs to be established. In the future, artificial intelligence will play a more important role in the standardization and precision management of diagnosis and treatment of digestive tract tumors.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDigestive System NeoplasmsEndoscopyGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDeep LearningHumansArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDiagnosisEndoscopyMalignant digestive tract tumorsPathology

Identifiers

PMID40205603
PMCPMC11983949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.