ArticleBMC medical education2025
Community health fairs as experiential learning: a qualitative exploration of benefits and challenges.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A "Grounded in Health" Fair: Applying Environmental Health Approaches in a Cross-Specialty Community-Based Initiative.Environmental health insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe shortage of clinical placements and preceptors necessitates innovative approaches to healthcare education. Community health fairs (CHFs) offer a potential solution, but their effectiveness as learning environments is limited. Further, there is lack of recent literature exploring CHFs settings as potential learning environments. This study examined and explored the benefits and challenges of healthcare students and faculty participating in a CHF setting.
methodsUsing a semi-structured guide developed by the researchers for this study, qualitative conversational interviews were conducted with 14 participants (7 students, 7 faculty) involved in an annual CHF. Prior to the interview, all participants completed a demographic data sheet. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, checked for accuracy, and de-identified, and MAXQDA was used to manage and code the interviews. Two coders analyzed the transcripts, and a third coder served to confirm the qualitative findings, and Clarke and Braun thematic analysis was employed to develop themes. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample.
resultsSeven faculty participated in this study; the age range was 34-64 and years in practice ranged from 7 to 23, four participants were advanced practice nurses (28.6%), two mental health providers (14.3%), and one dental provider (7.1%). The student participants consisted of five dental hygiene students (35.7%) and two nursing students (14.3%). Participants were predominantly female (92.9%), with one male participant (7.1%). The average interview lasted 8 min reflecting the dynamic and fast-paced nature of CHFs. Four major themes emerged from the interviews: (1) Skills development and practical experience, (2) Perspective enhancement, (3) Challenges within the Learning environment, and (4) Recommendations for enhancing health fair settings experiences.
conclusionsCHFs can serve as valuable active learning environments that promote clinical skill development and broaden perspectives. To improve CHFs experiences, participants discussed increasing collaborations with other healthcare institutions within the state, making the examination rooms more realistic, and increasing privacy for the patients. Participants also recommended pre-training of healthcare volunteers and incorporating technology for teaching patients. More research is needed to evaluate the utility of CHFs as a learning environment. This is urgent since clinical settings are limited and saturated. Further, researchers should continue doing research in this environment since the literature is scant and dated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.