Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40205592›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Community health fairs as experiential learning: a qualitative exploration of benefits and challenges.

Martha Rojo, Scott Wright, Jing Jin, Erickson Feliciano, Margaret Love, Sharon Stevenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martha RojoCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Scott WrightOffice of Educational Development, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Jing JinCollege of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Erickson FelicianoCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. efeliciano@uams.edu.
Margaret LoveCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.
Sharon StevensonCollege of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS), 4301 W. Markham St., Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe shortage of clinical placements and preceptors necessitates innovative approaches to healthcare education. Community health fairs (CHFs) offer a potential solution, but their effectiveness as learning environments is limited. Further, there is lack of recent literature exploring CHFs settings as potential learning environments. This study examined and explored the benefits and challenges of healthcare students and faculty participating in a CHF setting.

methodsUsing a semi-structured guide developed by the researchers for this study, qualitative conversational interviews were conducted with 14 participants (7 students, 7 faculty) involved in an annual CHF. Prior to the interview, all participants completed a demographic data sheet. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, checked for accuracy, and de-identified, and MAXQDA was used to manage and code the interviews. Two coders analyzed the transcripts, and a third coder served to confirm the qualitative findings, and Clarke and Braun thematic analysis was employed to develop themes. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample.

resultsSeven faculty participated in this study; the age range was 34-64 and years in practice ranged from 7 to 23, four participants were advanced practice nurses (28.6%), two mental health providers (14.3%), and one dental provider (7.1%). The student participants consisted of five dental hygiene students (35.7%) and two nursing students (14.3%). Participants were predominantly female (92.9%), with one male participant (7.1%). The average interview lasted 8 min reflecting the dynamic and fast-paced nature of CHFs. Four major themes emerged from the interviews: (1) Skills development and practical experience, (2) Perspective enhancement, (3) Challenges within the Learning environment, and (4) Recommendations for enhancing health fair settings experiences.

conclusionsCHFs can serve as valuable active learning environments that promote clinical skill development and broaden perspectives. To improve CHFs experiences, participants discussed increasing collaborations with other healthcare institutions within the state, making the examination rooms more realistic, and increasing privacy for the patients. Participants also recommended pre-training of healthcare volunteers and incorporating technology for teaching patients. More research is needed to evaluate the utility of CHFs as a learning environment. This is urgent since clinical settings are limited and saturated. Further, researchers should continue doing research in this environment since the literature is scant and dated.

Indexed as

Problem-Based LearningAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchYoung AdultFaculty, nursingHealth fairsInterprofessional educationQualitative researchStudents, health occupations

Identifiers

PMID40205592
PMCPMC11983726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.