ArticleBMC psychology2025
Addressing the associative stigma of psychiatry and psychiatrists: a survey on the attitudes of medical and nursing students and doctors in Verona, Italy.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Attitudes and Career Preferences Towards Psychiatry in South Asia: A Narrative Review of Medical Student and Physician Perspectives.Health science reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNegative societal attitudes toward mental health often contribute to misconceptions and stereotypes about psychiatry, a phenomenon known as "associative stigma". This stigma can hinder collaboration between psychiatrists and other specialists and deter students from pursuing psychiatry as a career. This study focused on one of the three main components of stigma by examining attitudes toward psychiatry and psychiatrists among medical and nursing students, as well as doctors, and identifying factors that influence these attitudes.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical and nursing students at the University of Verona and doctors affiliated to the Medical Professional Association of Verona. Attitudes toward psychiatry were assessed using the Attitude to Psychiatry Scale. Regression analysis evaluated the relationship between participants' characteristics and their attitudes toward psychiatry and psychiatrists.
resultsA total of 511 medical students, 394 nursing students, and 638 doctors participated in the study. While students had generally positive attitudes towards psychiatry, they perceived it as lacking full respect within medial community (84% medical, 76% nursing), having low prestige (63.5% medical, 65.9% nursing), and receiving insufficient encouragement in university courses (39% medical, 41.7% nursing). Doctors also expressed positive attitudes, though to a lesser extent than students. Their primary concerns related to patient care: 81% reported feeling emotionally drained when treating psychiatric patients, and 58.2% felt that patients were not appreciative of the care received. Female students and doctors, students who had taken psychiatric courses, and doctors in non-surgical specialties exhibited more positive attitudes.
conclusionsThis study revealed generally positive attitudes towards psychiatry, underscoring its relevance as a medical specialty. However, concerns regarding the discipline's perceived status and respect within the medical field highlight areas for targeted interventions to enhance its image and encourage greater interest among students and professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.