ArticleJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2025
Pediatric head trauma algorithm for head CT decision-making in the emergency department.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric head injury in the emergency department: balancing radiation risk, missed diagnoses, and decision-rule evolution.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Modern management of maxillofacial trauma in the emergency department.World journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic brain injury is a common cause of admission in Emergency Department (ED) for pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) traumatic brain injury (TBI) algorithm in ED for head CT decision-making in pediatric patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of adherence to this protocol on ED crowding, length of stay, and boarding time.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study including children aged ≤ 15 years who were admitted in a level 2 trauma center ED for mild TBI from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019. Collected data included amnesia, symptoms, demographics, outcomes, length of ED stay, the patient's outcomes, including intracranial injuries (ICI) and injuries requiring neurosurgery.
resultsA total of 1372 children with mild TBI were included. More than half of the patients were male (59.8%) and ≥ 2 years of age (63.2%). Most of the trauma events (58%) were caused by home injury. Neurosurgical consultation (59.4%) was the most common intervention in the ED. Only 4.3% of patients required neuroimaging and 7 children had intracranial hemorrhage, with only 1 requiring immediate neurosurgical intervention. There were no re-admissions for bleeding. The adoption of this protocol had no negative impact on crowding, and a reduction of ED length of stay.
conclusionsThe adoption of the PECARNE algorithm led to fewer brain computed tomography scans with good clinical outcomes without increasing crowding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.