ArticleClinical epigenetics2025
Influence of race, ethnicity, and sex on the performance of epigenetic predictors of phenotypic traits.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating biological aging into clinical practice: a review and path forward for precision longevity medicine.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Epigenetic entropy, socioeconomic differences, and health and lifespan in the Women's Health Initiative.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Observational
- Dietary fatty acids and epigenetic aging in US adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.npj aging · 2025Article
- From population science to the clinic? Limits of epigenetic clocks as personal biomarkers.Epigenomics · 2025Article
- DNA methylation-based health predictors: advances, applications, and perspectives.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- DNA methylation age deviation and cognitive status among older adults in the US, NHANES 1999-2002.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Red Blood Cells and Human Aging: Exploring Their Biomarker Potential.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- DNA methylation clocks and cognitive status among older adults in the US, NHANES 1999-2002.Epigenetics reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNA methylation-based predictors of phenotypic traits including leukocyte proportions, smoking activity, biological aging, and circulating levels of plasma proteins are widely used as biomarkers in public health research. However, limited racial and ethnic diversity of research participants is an ongoing issue for epigenetics research, and the potential downstream impacts of limited diversity in training samples on the performance of epigenetic predictors remains poorly understood. We examined the performance of epigenetic predictors of chronological age (also known as epigenetic clocks), telomere length, cell proportions, and plasma proteins within a diverse sample of adult NHANES participants during the 1999-2000 and 2001-2002 survey cycles, both overall and stratified by self-reported race/ethnicity and sex. We utilized correlation coefficients and median absolute errors (MAE) to judge predictor performance, and bootstrapping and multivariate regression to assess the significance of differences between groups.
resultsAll epigenetic predictors were significantly associated with their corresponding phenotypic traits in the overall population, with particularly high correlations for the epigenetic clocks and cell proportion estimates. Several significant differences in performance were observed between racial/ethnic groups, particularly for the plasma protein predictors, with a reoccurring trend of lower correlation in Mexican American and non-Hispanic Black participants compared to non-Hispanic White participants. Sex-differences in performance for several predictors were also identified but were not as pronounced. Multivariate regression models indicated that disparities in epigenetic predictor performance persisted after accounting for overall differences in epigenetic predictions related to race/ethnicity and sex, as well as further adjustment for estimated cell proportions and SES variables.
conclusionsWe found evidence for substantial disparities in epigenetic predictor performance, with each predictor exhibiting at least one significant difference in correlation or MAE related to race, ethnicity, or sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.