Trial reportBMC oral health2025
Impact of connected toothbrushes on patient perceptions of brushing skills and oral health: results from a randomized clinical trial and a single-arm intervention study.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Journey of Oral Hygiene: The Past, the Present, the Future.Journal of periodontal research · 2026Article
- Digital Dentistry in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review of Current Capabilities and Future Directions.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Connected toothbrushes, where an electric toothbrush connects wirelessly to a smartphone app that provides feedback and guidance to the user, can improve clinical indicators of oral health. However, the impact of the connected brush on user perceptions of brushing skills, behaviors, "everyday" oral health (e.g., breath odor, how clean teeth feel), and user perceptions of the smartphone app are also important. In this study, a novel PRO measure - the Everyday Oral Health and Brushing (EOHAB) Questionnaire - was implemented to capture these important views. The EOHAB was administered in: (1) a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT; N = 80) comparing a connected toothbrush to an unconnected electric brush over 6 weeks and (2) a single-arm study (N = 159), where participants used an electric brush alone for 1 week and then a connected brush for 3-4 weeks. EOHAB scores addressing perceptions of brushing behaviors/skills, oral health, and the usefulness and ease of use of the app were calculated. Impression of change items that directly asked users about changes in their perceptions were scored separately. In the single-arm study, perceptions of brushing skills and behaviors were very positive prior to using the unconnected or connected brush and then became incrementally more positive after using the electric brush alone and then the connected brush before decreasing at the last assessment interval. In both studies, cross-sectional correlations between the EOHAB scores and objective measures of brushing behavior and clinical measures were close to zero. Increased brushing duration and coverage over time were observed when participants reported improved perceptions on impression of change items and positive ratings of app utility, but not other EOHAB scores. In the RCT, the connected brush significantly improved several impression of change items, but not other EOHAB items asking about current perspectives. In sum, use of a connected toothbrush was associated with improved brushing and oral health perceptions when EOHAB questions asked directly about changes since starting use of the toothbrush. Brushing metrics improved as views on the app became more positive. Although not uniform, the results support previous studies indicating that connected brush systems can improve patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.