Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40205374›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025

An artificial intelligence model utilizing endoscopic ultrasonography for differentiating small and micro gastric stromal tumors from gastric leiomyomas.

Ruifeng Duan, Liwei Duan, Xin Chen, Min Liu, Xiangyi Song, Lijuan Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruifeng DuanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun, Jilin, China.
Liwei DuanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun, Jilin, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun, Jilin, China.
Min LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun, Jilin, China.
Xiangyi SongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun, Jilin, China.
Lijuan WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Center, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Chang Chun, Jilin, China. ljwei@jlu.edu.cn.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province YDZJ202301ZYTS477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric stromal tumors (GSTs) and gastric leiomyomas (GLs) represent the primary subtypes of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) characterized by distinct biological characteristics and treatment modalities. The accurate differentiation between GSTs and GLs poses a significant clinical challenge. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) leveraging endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) have demonstrated promising results in the categorization of larger-diameter SMTs (> 2.0 cm). However, the diagnostic capacity of AI models for micro-diameter SMTs (< 1.0 cm) remains uncertain due to limited imaging features. This study seeks to develop a specialized diagnostic model utilizing EUS images to differentiate small and micro GSTs from GLs effectively.

methodsIn this study, a dataset comprising 358 EUS images of GSTs or GLs was utilized for training the EUS-AI model. Subsequently, 216 EUS images were allocated for validation purposes, with 159 images in validation set 1 (micro SMTs: tumor diameter < 1.0 cm) and 216 images in validation set 2 (small SMTs: tumor diameter < 2.0 cm). The diagnostic performance of the EUS-AI model for individual tumors was assessed by consolidating the diagnostic outcomes of the corresponding images. Comparative analyses were conducted between the diagnostic outcomes of endoscopists, clinical signatures, and those of the EUS-AI models.

resultsThe EUS-AI models were developed using DenseNet201, ResNet50, and VGG19 architectures. Among the three models, the ResNet50 model demonstrated superior performance on EUS images, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.938, 0.832, and 0.841 in the training set, validation set 1, and validation set 2, respectively. By combining predictions from multiple images for each tumor, the diagnostic efficacy of ResNet50 was further enhanced, resulting in AUCs of 0.994, 0.911, and 0.915 in the aforementioned sets. In comparison, both clinical signatures and endoscopists exhibited notably lower AUC values than those obtained with the EUS-AI model.

conclusionsThe EUS-AI model utilizing ResNet50 architecture effectively discriminates between micro GSTs and GLs from both image-centric and tumor-centric perspectives. Demonstrating superior diagnostic efficiency compared to clinical models and assessments by endoscopists, the EUS-AI model serves as a valuable tool for clinicians in precisely distinguishing small and micro GSTs from GLs before surgery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEndosonographyGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsLeiomyomaStomach NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedArtificial intelligenceDifferential diagnosisEndoscopic ultrasonographyGastric leiomyomasGastric stromal tumors

Identifiers

PMID40205374
PMCPMC11983923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.