SynthesisThe journal of headache and pain2025
Cluster headache diagnostic delay and its predictors: a systematic review with a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential association of cluster headache with certain COVID-19 vaccines: An assessment from the pharmacovigilance databases.Headache · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Neurotransmitter Imbalance in Cluster Headache: A Systematic Review of Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Hallmarks of primary headache: part 3 - cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite its characteristic clinical expression, cluster headache (CH) often remains unrecognized in clinical practice, with patients suffering from CH having to wait a long time before receiving a correct diagnosis and benefit from appropriate treatment.
methodsThis work is a systematic review of data accessible through PubMed and published up to December 2024, focusing on the delay in CH diagnosis and its predictors. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the mean CH diagnostic delay using the inverse of variance as the weight. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify predictors of this delay.
resultsAmong the 108 studies identified, 22 and 11 were selected for the qualitative analysis and meta-analysis respectively. These selected studies included a total of 8654 subjects (range 23-1604). This whole population was composed of 6383 men, 2180 women and 91 subjects with sex not specified. CH form was indicated for 7177 subjects with 5808, 1182 and 187 with episodic CH, chronic CH and undetermined form respectively. Meta-analysis estimated the overall CH diagnostic delay at 10,43 years (95% CI [9.09; 11.77]) with a reduction in the CH diagnostic delay over time since the sixties and the continuation of such a reduction every decade since 2000. Qualitative analyses identified several predictors of this diagnostic delay. Autonomic symptoms were associated with a decrease in the delay of diagnosis, whereas lower age of CH onset, alternating attack side and nocturnal headaches were associated with an increase in the delay of diagnosis.
conclusionThis systematic review including meta-analysis confirms an important unmet need in terms of CH diagnosis. Further work is needed to identify more precisely the predictors of this delay for better management of patients suffering from CH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 01/10/2025 (registration number: CRD42025630779).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.