ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Single-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals prognosis-related stromal signatures that potentiate stratification of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-functional nanovesicles simultaneously inhibit stromal fibrosis and angiogenesis to suppress cholangiocarcinoma progression.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Single-cell multi-omics in biliary tract cancers: decoding heterogeneity, microenvironment, and treatment strategies.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) is a rare but refractory cancer with dense desmoplasia. Prognosis-associated stromal cells in eCCA remain poorly characterized. Here, we profiled the tumor cellular composition and identified prognosis-related stromal signatures by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) in eCCA. ECCA patients were further stratified into different categories based on identified stromal signatures.
methodsUsing scRNA-seq, we profiled the transcriptomes of 37,498 individual cells from eight eCCA biopsies, including five tumor tissues and three paired adjacent normal tissues. Bulk RNA sequencing (bRNA-seq) was also performed on 43 eCCA tumor tissues. Stromal cell composition and heterogeneity were examined through differential gene expression and gene set enrichment analyses. By assessing the expression levels of marker genes in bRNA-seq data, the correlation of stromal cell clusters with survival was explored. The GSVA scores of the cell-specific signature genes of the prognosis-related stromal cell subtypes were calculated and used to stratify eCCA patients.
resultsThe results revealed that tumor stroma in eCCA were composed of hematopoietic progenitor-like cells (HPLCs), fibroblasts (Fb), Schwann cells (Sch), endothelial cells and immune cells. Prognosis-associated stromal cell subpopulations included MKI67 + HPLC, TMEM158 + C3-Fb, FOXP3 + regulatory T cells (Treg), SLIT2 + Sch, TPSD1 + C2-mast cells (MC) and CTSG + C3-MC. Based on these stromal signatures, the eCCA tumors were categorized into three classes: proliferative Group 1 with enrichment of MKI67 + HPLC, inflammatory and fibrotic Group 2 with enrichment of TPSD1 + C2- MC, FOXP3 + Treg and TMEM158 + C3-Fb, and neuronal Group 3 with enrichment of SLIT2 + Sch and CTSG + C3-MC. ECCA patients in Group 3 had a better prognosis when compared to Group 1 and 2, reflecting different impact of stromal subtypes on tumor progression.
conclusionSingle-cell transcriptomic analysis reveals prognosis-related stromal signatures that potentiate the stratification of eCCA into proliferative, inflammatory and fibrotic, and neuronal phenotypes, which has important implications on molecular classification and exploring therapeutic targets in eCCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.