ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Inpatient outcomes of upper cervical fractures in the elderly: a retrospective analysis of 268 cases.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Outcomes of Craniocervical Junction Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Series.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Predictors of surgical management and its impact on outcomes for combined C1-C2 fractures: National registry study.SICOT-J · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe incidence of upper cervical fractures in elderly individuals is increasing, necessitating enhanced treatment approaches.
methodA retrospective study of 268 elderly patients with upper cervical fractures was conducted to assess inpatient outcomes aged 75 and older with atlas and/or axis fractures. Patient risk was evaluated using the ASA score and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). In-hospital mortality and functional outcomes were assessed, with fracture treatment strategies following AO principles.
resultsPatients with C1, C2 or combined fractures did not differ in age, CCI, Barthel score or length of hospital stay (p > 0.05). C2 fractures were predominant, and the majority of patients suffered at least from a severe general disease (ASA ≥ 3). Comparing operatively and conservatively treated patients, regardless of fracture localization, revealed no significant differences in mortality, both overall and time-related. Surgical patients experienced a higher frequency of general complications, notably dyspnea. The overall mortality rate was 14.9%, with 15.7% in the nonoperative group and 14.4% in the surgical group (p = 0.8628). The overall rate of general complications was 51.4% (n = 51) in the nonoperative group and 71.9% (n = 110) in the operatively treated group. Anterior fixation procedures showed significantly higher rates of pneumonia and respiratory complications, while mortality and other complications did not differ significantly between posterior and anterior surgical approaches.
conclusionThe in-hospital mortality and morbidity of elderly patients with upper cervical fractures are high but do not significantly differ between operatively and nonoperatively treated patients. The complexity of the geriatric patient population highlights the need for peri- and postinpatient geriatric complex treatment, emphasizing the importance of establishing geriatric-specialized care structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.