Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40205328›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2025

Wild house mice have a more dynamic and aerotolerant gut microbiota than laboratory mice.

Eveliina Hanski, Susan Joseph, Michael A Curtis, James W Swann, Marie Vallier, Miriam Linnenbrink, John F Baines, Jens-Kjeld Jensen, Andrew Wolfenden, Iris Mair and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Eveliina HanskiDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. eveliina.hanski@biology.ox.ac.uk.
Susan JosephCentre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, London, UK.
Michael A CurtisCentre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, King's College London, London, UK.
James W SwannColumbia Stem Cell Initiative, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Marie VallierMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Miriam LinnenbrinkMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
John F BainesMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Plön, Germany.
Jens-Kjeld JensenÍ Geilini, Nólsoy, Faroe Islands.
Andrew WolfendenSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Iris MairLydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kathryn J ElseLydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Janette E BradleySchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Wieteke HolthuijzenDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA.
Jonathan H PlissnerU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Midway Atoll NWR, Midway Island, USA.
Aura RauloDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Maude QuicrayDepartment of Functional and Evolutionary Entomology, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Sarah C L KnowlesDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. sarah.knowles@biology.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P018157/1HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 851550National Geographic Society EC-58520R-19NERC Environmental Bioinformatics Centre NE/L011867/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian gut microbiota is a complex microbial community with diverse impacts on host biology. House mice (Mus musculus) are the major model organism for research on mammals, but laboratory domestication has altered their gut microbiota from that of their wild counterparts. Knowledge about how and why the gut microbiota of this species varies between lab and wild settings and among natural populations could improve its utility as a model organism. Here, we use a large dataset comprising over 800 house mouse samples from multiple laboratory facilities and strains and wild mice from mainland and island populations to investigate gut microbiota variation in this species across contrasting genetic and environmental settings. Across geographically disparate populations, we find that wild mice possess a gut microbiota that is compositionally distinct, displays a higher relative abundance and richness of aerotolerant taxa, and is taxonomically and functionally more diverse than that of lab mice. Longitudinally sampled wild mice also display markedly higher temporal turnover in microbiota composition than lab mice. Wild mice from oceanic islands harboured microbiotas that differed subtly from those of mainland wild mice and were more divergent from lab mouse microbiotas. These findings highlight much greater spatial and temporal turnover of gut microbes in wild compared to laboratory mice.

Indexed as

Animals, LaboratoryAnimals, WildBacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBiodiversityFecesMiceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial aerotoleranceGut microbiotaHouse mice (Mus musculus)Microbiota turnoverWild vs lab

Identifiers

PMID40205328
PMCPMC11983872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.