ArticleAMB Express2025
Mendelian randomization study of lipid species reveals causal relationship with syphilis.
Article in AMB Express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although some studies have reported a possible association between lipid and the development and progression of syphilis, the overall causal relationship between lipid and syphilis remains unclear. Data abstracted from extensive genome-wide association studies were utilized to pinpoint genetic variations linked to 179 distinct lipid species. Subsequently, these variations served as instrumental variables in Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses, aimed at evaluating the causal impact of these lipid species on the occurrence of syphilis. A range of methods, including Weighted Mode, Weighted Median, Simple Mode, MR Egger, and Inverse Variance Weighted, were employed to determine the causal influence. For the purpose of sensitivity analysis, techniques such as Inverse Variance Weighted, MR-Egger, the MR Steiger test, the MR-Egger Intercept Test, and MR-PRESSO were applied. Additionally, Multivariate Mendelian Randomization (MVMR) analyses were conducted to directly assess the causal effect of lipid species on the risk of syphilis. Sterol ester (SE) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) could potentially impact syphilis risk. Specifically, SE (27:1/16:0), SE (27:1/18:2), SE (27:1/18:3), SE (27:1/20:3), and SE (27:1/22:6) were linked to an elevated risk of syphilis. PC (18:2_0:0) was linked to an elevated risk of syphilis. In contrast, PC (16:1_18:0) exhibited a protective role against syphilis. No heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was detected. SE (27:1/16:0), SE (27:1/18:2), SE(27:1/18:3), SE (27:1/20:3), and SE (27:1/22:6) were no longer significantly associated with syphilis in the MVMR analysis (P>0.05). In addition, the previously observed effect of PC (18:2_0:0) on syphilis in univariate MR Was no longer significant in MVMR analysis. However, genetically predicted PC (16:1_18:0) was still significantly negatively associated with syphilis, consistent with univariate MR analysis. We observed that hereditary SE and PC levels appear to be associated with syphilis susceptibility. Future research is needed to understand the mechanisms behind this supposed causation and to develop corresponding treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.