ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2025
Management of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms: a combinatorial approach with phytochemical.
Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibiotic-phytochemical combinations against Enterococcus faecalis: a therapeutic strategy optimized using response surface methodology.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid emergence of antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus faecalis infections was primarily due to their robust biofilm formation, highlighting the urgent need for meaningful strategies. Since combinatorial application of natural phytochemical often offer promising outcomes in dealing with microbial infections, present study indicated the pharmacological, antimicrobial and antibiofilm potential of combinatorial strategies of natural phytochemical involving cuminaldehyde and thymoquinone against E. faecalis. Towards this direction, in silico analysis suggested that both compounds could show favourable oral bioavailability and high GI absorption, with a considerable solubility and drug-likeness profiles. Furthermore, in vitro antimicrobial assay indicated that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of cuminaldehyde and thymoquinone were found to be 500 µg/mL and 30 µg/mL, respectively against E. faecalis. Thereafter, the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index score of 0.73 indicated an additive effect prevailed between cuminaldehyde and thymoquinone, enhancing their antimicrobial potential. Thereafter, sub-MIC doses of cuminaldehyde (40 µg/mL) and thymoquinone (8 µg/mL) were selected to assess their antibiofilm potential. Though the compounds were able to show antibiofilm activity separately, their combination was significantly more effective, reduced biofilm formation by approximately 80%, and decreased production of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) and protein content by ~ 76% and ~ 70%, respectively. Further studies revealed that the antibiofilm activity of the test compounds could likely to be attributed to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and enhancement of membrane permeability. Taken together, all this experimental observation revealed that combination of these natural compounds could potentially improve the treatment outcomes of biofilm-borne infections of E. faecalis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.