ArticleOdontology2025
Effect of air-thinning a two-step adhesive layer on bond strength to tooth substrates.
Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Use of Bovine Teeth as an Experimental Substrate in the Evaluation of Shear in Contemporary Adhesive Systems.Polymers · 2026Article
- Influence of film thickness of one and two-step universal adhesives on dentin bond strength.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Influence of immediate versus delayed dentin sealing on marginal integrity in indirect composite restorations.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of air-thinning to a two-step adhesive (G2-BOND Universal) on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) between bovine teeth (enamel, dentin) and a resin composite (G-ænial A'CHORD). The adhesive was applied with or without air-blowing before light curing on the bovine enamel and dentin surfaces finished using 320-grit SiC paper. After resin composite buildup, µTBS specimens (1.0 mm × 1.0 mm cross-sectional area) were fabricated. The µTBS values were determined 24 h, 4 weeks, and 6 months after the specimen preparation. Furthermore, the adhesive layer thicknesses were measured on the SEM photographs of the specimens' fractured site after the µTBS test. Except for the enamel specimens at 6 months, no significant differences were observed in µTBS determined at any time periods between specimens with and without air-blowing (p > 0.05). µTBS values in air-blown specimens increased from 24 h to 4 weeks, and the values in non-air-blown specimens were greater at 6 months than at 24 h. Specimens subjected to air-blowing showed significantly thinner adhesive layer than those without at any time periods (p < 0.05). Although air-blowing reduced adhesive layer thickness, it did not affect the bond strength except for the enamel specimens at 6 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40205243What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.