ArticleProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2026
Supplemental Probiotics, Postbiotics, and Their Combination on the Growth, Slaughter Variables, Organ Development, Intestinal Morphology, and Cecal Microbiota of Broilers.
Article in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Postbiotics in Poultry Health and Performance: A Review on Existing Knowledge and Further Research Needs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Lactobacillus salivarius D5 improves growth performance and immune function in broilers by reducing Escherichia coli abundance and regulating the gut microbiota.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Effects of marine-derived Enterococcus durans YQ-6 on growth performance, intestinal health and microbial community of Leizhou black ducks.Poultry science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate the effects of dietary supplementation with viable Bacillus subtilis, inactivated Lactobacillus plantarum, and their combination on growth and slaughter performance, immune organ and small intestine development, and cecal microbiota of broilers. A total of 480 one-day-old broilers were used across a 42-day feeding experiment and were fed a basal diet, a basal diet + 300 mg/kg viable B. subtilis (probiotic), 320 mg/kg heat-killed L. plantarum (postbiotic), or their mixtures (combination). Each diet had six replicates, and each replicate had 20 broilers. Compared to the control group, the final body weight and average daily gain increased, and the feed conversion ratio decreased in the probiotic and postbiotic groups, while the combination group showed parameters comparable to those of the postbiotic group. Feeding broilers with probiotic, postbiotic, and their combination increased the dressing-out percentage, indices of the spleen and bursa of Fabricius, and lengths and weights of the small intestine. In addition, the villus height/crypt depth ratio of both the duodenum and jejunum was increased in the probiotic and postbiotic groups. Broilers in the combination group had a lower abundance of Proteobacteria, while those in the probiotic and postbiotic groups had a higher abundance of Desulfovibrio in the cecum. Overall, we concluded that dietary supplementation with viable B. subtilis and inactivated L. plantarum could improve growth and slaughter performance, organ development, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbiota of broilers. However, their combination had not yielded a synergistic and additive effect on broilers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40205163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.