ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response and Genetic Susceptibility in Recently Parous Women with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postpartum breast cancer as a distinct oncologic entity: linking physiological tissue remodelling to tumor biology and clinical translation.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWomen with recent parity are at increased short-term breast cancer (BC) risk and face a worse prognosis. The effect of parity on response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unstudied, and the influence of inherited susceptibility on parity-related short-term risk remains unclear.
methodsA retrospective case-cohort study analyzed women age 50 years or younger with non-metastatic BC diagnosed between 2010 and 2020 who underwent genetic testing and were treated at Northwestern Medicine. Associations between NAC response and recency of parity were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression, stratified by tumor biologic subtypes. Relationships between germline mutations, recency of parity, and BC were explored via multi-state modeling and linear regression.
resultsAmong 1080 eligible women, 231 received NAC. Treatment response was poorer in parous women with triple-negative tumors than in nullipara women regardless of the recency of parity (P < 0.03). Among 122 women (11.3%) with detectable pathogenic mutations, adjusted analyses with both modeling approaches showed no indications that BRCA1/2 carriers had a greater hazard of a BC diagnosis in the decade after recent parity than nulliparous mutation carriers. For BRCA2 and PALB2 carriers, BC diagnosis occurred less frequently in the postpartum intervals.
conclusionThis study showed a poor response to NAC in parous triple-negative BC (TNBC) patients than in nullipara patients. The effects of immunotherapy-based regimens deserve evaluation in the context of parity. Postpartum BC occurrence is not increased in BRCA1/2 carriers. The effects of rarer susceptibility genes may differ. These important effects of parity on BC in young women and those at genetic risk warrant larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40205151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.