ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Mapping the complexity of motor variability: From individual space of variability to motor fingerprints.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional average-based metrics have long been considered the gold standard in behavioral and brain research. However, recent advances emphasize the importance of examining the dispersion around the mean to uncover the nuances of individual differences and challenge simplistic assumptions. Thus, the study of variability is becoming increasingly central across a wide range of domains. Here, we tackle the composite architecture of motor variability by proposing a new geometric method to model it. Three independent gait datasets are used to: i) develop the method (Dataset 1), ii) evaluate its performance when transitioning from optoelectronic cameras to inertial measurement units (Dataset 2), and iii) generalize it in an experimental design with cognitive manipulations (Dataset 3). The method is based on the Procrustes transformation and multidimensional scaling. This geometric approach allows us to define the individual space of variability (i.e., the amount of bidimensional space covered by each individual's trial-by-trial data). In turn, it provides robust evidence to identify each individual unique and specific motor signature (motor fingerprint). Our approach represents a fundamental shift from previous research: It is not the value of kinematic parameters per se that defines an individual's motor signature, but rather the distinct way in which each individual varies these parameters, i.e., the dispersion of the distribution of their kinematic data. This novel perspective provides a single-subject-weighted proxy for motor signature, based on the characteristic dispersion of each individual's data. The potential applications of this new method in research and clinical settings represent a fascinating future challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.