ReviewNature protocols2025
Transcriptomic profiling of individual bacteria by MATQ-seq.
Review in Nature protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-bacterium RNA-seq protocol to uncover heterogeneous expression of coding and noncoding genes in Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron.STAR protocols · 2026Article
- Uniform pre-processing of bacterial single-cell RNA-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Can Bacterial Manipulation Deliver Reef-Scale Thermal Enhancement of Corals?Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Draft genome sequence of cadmium-tolerantMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026Article
- Draft genome sequence of a chromium-resistant Bacillus altitudinis AK25 strain isolated from contaminated aquatic environment.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
- Advances in Single-Cell Sequencing for Infectious Diseases: Progress and Perspectives.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Mitochondrial Quality Control in Bovine Oocyte Maturation: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Prospects for Enhancing Reproductive Efficiency.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bacterial single-cell transcriptomics is revolutionizing our understanding of cell-to-cell variation within bacterial populations and enables gene expression profiling in complex microbial communities. Using the eukaryotic multiple annealing and dC-tailing-based quantitative single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) (MATQ-seq) approach, we have developed a robust bacterial scRNA-seq protocol, which integrates index sorting, random priming and rRNA depletion. This method stands out for its high rate of cell retention and its suitability for experiments with limited input material, offering a reliable method even for small sample sizes. Here we provide a step-by-step protocol covering the entire process of generating single-bacteria transcriptomes, including experimental and computational analysis. It involves (i) single-cell isolation via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and cell lysis, (ii) reverse transcription and cDNA amplification using robotic liquid handling, (iii) rRNA depletion, (iv) indexing and sequencing, and (v) data processing steps to start comprehensive data analysis. Using model organisms such as Salmonella enterica, we show that the method achieves a retention rate of 95%, defined as the rate of initially sorted cells converted into effective sequencing libraries. This substantially surpasses other available protocols. The method robustly detects 300-600 genes per cell, highlighting its effectiveness in capturing a broad transcriptomic profile. The entire procedure from FACS-based single-cell isolation to raw data generation spans ~5 d. As MATQ-seq has already been proven robust in several bacterial species, it holds promise for the establishment of a streamlined microbial scRNA-seq platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40204970What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.