ArticleScientific reports2025
The use of artificial intelligence-based Siamese neural network in personalized guidance for sports dance teaching.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work aims to explore an accurate and effective method for recognizing dance movement features, providing precise personalized guidance for sports dance teaching. First, a human skeletal graph is constructed. A graph convolutional network (GCN) is employed to extract features from the nodes (joints) and edges (bone connections) in the graph structure, capturing both spatial relationships and temporal dynamics between joints. The GCN generates effective motion representations by aggregating the features of each node and its neighboring nodes. A dance movement recognition model combining GCN and a Siamese neural network (SNN) is proposed. The GCN module is responsible for extracting spatial features from the skeletal graph, while the SNN module evaluates the similarity between different skeletal sequences by comparing their features. The SNN employs a twin network structure, where two identical and parameter-sharing feature extraction networks process two input samples and calculate their distance or similarity in a high-dimensional feature space. The model is trained and validated on the COCO dataset. The results show that the proposed GCN-SNN model achieves an accuracy of 96.72% and an F1 score of 86.55%, significantly outperforming other comparison models. This work not only provides an efficient and intelligent personalized guidance method for sports dance teaching but also opens new avenues for the application of artificial intelligence in the education sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.