ArticleScientific reports2025
Transmission of tomato fruit blotch virus by the tomato russet mite: epidemiological implications for an emerging/re-emerging tomato disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pioneering plant virology research for a healthier future: a summary of the 2025 American Society for Virology (ASV) Plant Virology Satellite Symposium.Journal of virology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The tomato russet mite (TRM), Aculops lycopersici (Trombidiformes: Eriophyoidea), was recently suspected to be the vector of tomato fruit blotch virus (ToFBV; Blunervirus solani), a newly identified kitavirus infecting tomato cultivation worldwide. Tomato fruit blotch virus represents a serious threat to tomato crops, and its transmission needs to be clarified to achieve better disease control and monitoring. Two independent transmission trials were performed by inoculating 20 and 18 healthy tomato plants with viruliferous TRM specimens. A total of 13 plants (34.21%) resulted to be infected at different time points across an 18-week period, and showed foliar symptoms consisting of slight mosaic, chlorotic areas and discoloration that were solely attributed to ToFBV infection. This is the first evidence of the ability of TRM to acquire and transmit ToFBV from and to tomato plants. The highest rate of infection and the peak of virus titre occurred late, between ten and 14 weeks after inoculation. Afterwards, a general decrease in virus infection was recorded, in association with two opposite phenological responses in the host plants that worsened or improved their vegetative status. The involvement of the eriophyid vector and the limited adaptation of ToFBV to tomato are possible explanations for such slow and erratic infection dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.