ArticleScientific reports2025
Application and exploration of garbage enzymes in soil remediation of multiple heavy metal pollution.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IM3, a Salmonella-antagonistic strain isolated from garbage enzyme: genome analysis, mechanism of action, and mRNA transcription kinetics.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
[Objective] To assess the bioremediation potential of garbage enzymes in heavy metal-contaminated lead-zinc mine soils. [Method] A pot experiment evaluated garbage enzymes application effects on: (1) Pb/Zn/Cd bioavailability and phytoavailability, (2) soil fertility parameters, (3) soil enzyme activities, and (4) physiological responses of Chinese cabbage. [Results] Garbage enzymes significantly reduced heavy metal bioavailability, decreasing leaf Pb/Zn/Cd concentrations by 66.8%/17.6%/37.4% and root levels by 34.3%/23.4%/46.8% versus controls. Soil fertility improved substantially, with available N/P/K increments of 2.43-31.2%, 1.86-45.5%, and 3.40-22.3%, respectively. Key soil enzymes (urease, sucrase, catalase, phosphatase) exhibited enhanced activities. Garbage enzymes treated plants showed increased biomass (fresh weight), chlorophyll (21.8%), and soluble sugars, alongside reduced stress markers: nitrate-N (-24.3%), malondialdehyde (-33.6%), proline (-18.9%), and superoxide dismutase (-42.1%). [Conclusions] Garbage enzymes demonstrate dual functionality in metal immobilization and soil revitalization, offering an eco-sustainable solution for restoring agricultural productivity in contaminated ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.