Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204890›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The Katakori disability index has cross-cultural validity for disability due to stiff neck/shoulder across Japan, the US, and Singapore.

Hiroshi Takasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiroshi TakasakiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, 343-8540, Japan. physical.therapy.takasaki@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Katakori, or neck and shoulder stiffness, is a common issue in Japan but also affects people globally. Recently, the Katakori Disability Index (KDI) was developed to measure the disability caused by Katakori, but its cross-cultural validity was unconfirmed. This study examined the KDI's validity across Japan, the US, and Singapore through cross-sectional surveys of individuals aged 20-69 experiencing Katakori. Using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA), cross-cultural validity was deemed to exist if no statistically significant difference was found after changing to the partial metric invariance. Further, internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, and KDI scores across the three countries were compared. MGCFA established cross-cultural validity by achieving partial metric invariance in 26 of 55 item combinations. Prevalence was 61.8% (420/680 participants) in the US and 75.1% (417/555 participants) in Singapore. Singaporeans (n = 162) reported the highest % KDI scores, followed by the US (n = 149), with the lowest scores being observed in Japan (n = 515). Internal consistency was strong across all countries (95% CI of alpha > 0.9). In conclusion, the KDI is valid for measuring Katakori disability across Japan, the US, and Singapore. This study underscores the need for global research on Katakori.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationNeckShoulderAdultAgedCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesReproducibility of ResultsSingaporeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40204890
PMCPMC11982398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.