Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204866›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Anatomy guided modality fusion for cancer segmentation in PET CT volumes and images.

Ibtihaj Ahmad, Sadia Jabbar Anwar, Bagh Hussain, Atiq Ur Rehman, Amine Bermak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ibtihaj AhmadNorthwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Sadia Jabbar AnwarNorthwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Bagh HussainNorthwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, 710072, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China.
Atiq Ur RehmanDivision of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar. atirehman@hbku.edu.qa.
Amine BermakDivision of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.

Funding

Qatar Research Development and Innovation Council ARG01-0522-230274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation in computed tomography (CT) provides detailed anatomical information, while positron emission tomography (PET) provide the metabolic activity of cancer. Existing segmentation models in CT and PET either rely on early fusion, which struggles to effectively capture independent features from each modality, or late fusion, which is computationally expensive and fails to leverage the complementary nature of the two modalities. This research addresses the gap by proposing an intermediate fusion approach that optimally balances the strengths of both modalities. Our method leverages anatomical features to guide the fusion process while preserving spatial representation quality. We achieve this through the separate encoding of anatomical and metabolic features followed by an attentive fusion decoder. Unlike traditional fixed normalization techniques, we introduce novel "zero layers" with learnable normalization. The proposed intermediate fusion reduces the number of filters, resulting in a lightweight model. Our approach demonstrates superior performance, achieving a dice score of 0.8184 and an [Formula: see text] score of 2.31. The implications of this study include more precise tumor delineation, leading to enhanced cancer diagnosis and more effective treatment planning.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAlgorithmsHumansTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID40204866
PMCPMC11982402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.