ArticleScientific reports2025
Safety of intensive care hyperbaric oxygen therapy sessions at a tertiary academic hospital.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal Changes in Diagnostic Composition and Treatment Activity Among Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients Receiving Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: An 11-Year Single-Centre Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy for poststernotomy deep sternal wound infection, mediastinitis, and sternal osteomyelitis after cardiac surgery: a scoping review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Staff-Reported Peri-Procedural Workflow Vulnerabilities and a Preliminary Checklist Prototype for Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Patients Undergoing Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: A Single-Centre Pilot Survey.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify, based on available literature, the risk factors for adverse events during transport and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) sessions in intensive care unit patients and to determine their impact on intra-ward mortality and hospitalization duration. A retrospective analysis was conducted on hospitalized intensive care patients requiring HBOT between 2013 and 2023 at the Department of Hyperbaric Medicine and Sea Rescue, University Centre for Maritime and Tropical Medicine in Gdynia, Poland. A total of 176 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The following risk factors for adverse events during transport and HBOT sessions were identified: continuous intravenous infusions of catecholamines and analgo-sedation, nighttime HBOT sessions (56.55% of all sessions), presence of pleural cavity drainage, and mechanical ventilation via an intubation tube. The number of HBOT sessions had a statistically significant effect in reducing the risk of death (RR = 0.71, p < 0.001), while the administration of catecholamines significantly increased the risk of death (RR = 3.56, p = 0.045). Patients with severe infections (NSTI and gas gangrene) are at higher risk of adverse events and mortality. Therefore, every effort should be made to prevent untoward incidents during their HBOT sessions, including transport to the hyperbaric chamber. The first 72 h of hospitalization for critically ill patients receiving HBOT are crucial for intra-ward survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.