Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204849›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Psychological distress in health care workers during the beginning, the middle, and the last part of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pavla Brennan Kearns, David Novák, Barbora Fryčová, Ingemar Kareholt, Miroslava Janoušková, Jana Šeblová, Dominika Seblova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pavla Brennan KearnsDepartment of Epidemiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic. pacermakova@gmail.com.
David NovákDepartment of Epidemiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Barbora FryčováDepartment of Epidemiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ingemar KareholtInstitute of Gerontology, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Miroslava JanouškováDepartment of Epidemiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jana ŠeblováDepartment of Epidemiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dominika SeblovaDepartment of Epidemiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic. nikaseblovaphd@gmail.com.

Funding

Ministry of Health Czech Republic NU22J-09-00064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic placed significant psychological strain on healthcare workers. Our study tracked health care workers in the Czech Republic throughout the pandemic to examine the impact of stressors on psychological distress over time and explore gender differences in these associations. We studied health care workers from the Czech arm of the international COVID-19 HEROES Study who took part in all three waves of data collection in 2020, 2021 and 2022 (n = 264). We employed a path model to examine the relationships among six stressors (low trust in workplace, assignment of new tasks, prioritization of patients, experience of death due to COVID-19, experience of discrimination or violence, contact with COVID-19 patients), psychological distress (measured by General Health Questionnaire), and covariates (age, gender, occupation). We incorporated autoregressive paths and interactions to assess the longitudinal impact of stressors. Prior levels of distress predicted subsequent distress, with significant carry-over effects observed between each wave. Stressors had direct association to distress in the same wave of data collection (2020 and 2021), but not in subsequent waves, and stressors in 2022 did not have a significant direct effect to distress. Men reported lower distress in 2020 and 2021, but not in 2022. Furthermore, no significant interactions between stressors and gender were found. Age and occupation were not related to distress levels. There is a need for adaptable mental health support that addresses current stressors through targeted interventions, while also providing ongoing monitoring beyond crises, particularly for individuals with high distress levels.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalAdultCzech RepublicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational StressPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19DistressHealth care workerOccupational stressorsPandemic

Identifiers

PMID40204849
PMCPMC11982212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.