ArticleScientific reports2025
Cytogenomic characterization of karyotypes with additional autosomal material.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosomal rearrangements involving additional material in individuals with phenotypic alterations usually result in partial trisomy, often accompanied by partial monosomy. To characterize chromosomal rearrangements and analyze genomic characteristics in the breakpoint regions in 31 patients with additional material on an autosomal chromosome. Different tests were performed to characterize these patients, including karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In silico analyses evaluated A/B chromosomal compartments, segmental duplications, and repetitive elements at breakpoints. The 31 rearrangements resulted in 47 copy number variations (CNVs) and a range of structural aberrations were identified, including six tandem duplications, 19 derivative chromosomes, two intrachromosomal rearrangements, one recombinant, two dicentric chromosomes, and one triplication. A deleted segment was associated with the duplication in 16 of the 19 patients with derivative chromosomes from translocation. Among the trios whose chromosome rearrangement origin could be investigated, 54,5% were de novo, 31,9% were maternally inherited, and 13,6% were paternally inherited from balanced translocations or inversion. Breakpoint analysis revealed that 22 were in the A compartment (euchromatin), 25 were in the B compartment (heterochromatin), and five were in an undefined compartment. Additionally, 14 patients had breakpoints in regions of segmental duplications and repeat elements. Our study found that a deletion accompanied by additional genetic material was present in 51.6% of the patients, uncovering the underlying genetic imbalances. Statistical analyses revealed a positive correlation between chromosome size and the occurrence of CNVs in the rearrangements. Furthermore, no preference was observed for breakpoints occurring in compartments A and B, repetitive elements, or segmental duplications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.