ArticleScientific reports2025
A lightweight deep learning model for multi-plant biotic stress classification and detection for sustainable agriculture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lightweight vision transformer and ResNet-9 models for real-time plant disease detection and pest classification with SHAP explainability.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Enhanced YOLO12 with spatial pyramid pooling for real-time cotton insect detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Q-TriLSTM-Vision: a quantum-interference- augmented tri-stream LSTM for multi-label plant stress recognition on the OLID-I benchmark.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Deep learning technique for plant disease classification and pest detection and model explainability elevating agricultural sustainability.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- A novel framework GRCornShot for corn disease detection using few shot learning with prototypical network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of crop stress detection: destructive, non-destructive, and ML-based approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant pathogens and pests hinder general plant health, resulting in poor agricultural yields and production. These threaten global food security and cause environmental and economic shortages. Amidst the available existing heavy deep learning (DL) models, there is an increasing demand for computation resources, memory constraints, delayed interface time, unscalable deployment, increased training time, higher data requirements, and inflexibility. To solve all these challenges, this study presents a robust and lightweight "AgarwoodNet" DL model. The research introduces and uses a new raw curated Agarwood pest and disease dataset (APDD) with 14 classes and 5,472 Agarwood leaf images from Brunei and the Turkey Plant Pests and Diseases (TPPD) dataset with 4,447 images categorized into 15 diverse classes of six plants. MATLAB deep learning toolbox was used to train the DL architectures. The performance assessment parameters considered Cohen's Kappa, specificity precision, F1 scores, and recall. The proposed AgarwoodNet achieved impressive Macro-average performance of 0.9666, 0.9714, and 0.9859 in Precision, Recall, and F1 Scores, respectively, and 0.9859 on Kappa when tested on APDD. More so, the model attained 95.85%, 96.13%, and 95.90% in testing using TPPD and 96.84% on Kappa with the model size of 37 megabytes, making it a lightweight model in relation to the pre-trained convolutional neural network a considerably heavy, others twice the proposed model. This model size is considerably light and can be implemented on low-memory devices, thus supporting sustainable agricultural applications that are precise and accurate in classifying and detecting plant diseases and diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.