Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204805›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The impact of biological variables on cell kinetics and differentiation dynamics in the mouse incisor epithelium.

Jihan Asmar, Elias Shahin, Xiaomeng Sui, Amnon Sharir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jihan AsmarFaculty of Dental Medicine, The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Elias ShahinFaculty of Dental Medicine, The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Xiaomeng SuiDepartment of Molecular Chemistry and Materials Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Amnon SharirFaculty of Dental Medicine, The Institute of Biomedical and Oral Research, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel. amnon.sharir@mail.huji.ac.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse incisor is a key model system for understanding the regulatory mechanisms governing dental stem cells (SCs). However, the effects of sex, age and strain on mouse incisor morphology and epithelial SC function remain unclear. We used micro-computed tomography and histology to analyze the apical region in males and females, two age groups, and two commonly used strains. Cell kinetics, enamel density, and volume were assessed to determine their impact on SC behavior and enamel properties. No differences were found in cell kinetics or enamel properties between male and female mice at 8 weeks of age. However, 3-week-old mice exhibited higher cell proliferation, lower enamel density, and reduced volume than 8-week-olds, highlighting age-dependent changes in SC activity and enamel formation. Additionally, strain-specific variations were observed, with ICR mice showing increased numbers of preameloblasts and higher enamel volume with lower density when compared to C57BL/6 mice at 8 weeks old. Our results establish a standardized framework for the examination of mouse incisor epithelial SCs. These standards will enhance research reproducibility and consistency, facilitate constructive critique by reviewers, and enable a deeper understanding of the complex factors influencing SC behavior across diverse physiological contexts.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationIncisorAnimalsCell ProliferationDental EnamelEpithelial CellsEpitheliumFemaleKineticsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred ICRStem CellsX-Ray Microtomography

Identifiers

PMID40204805
PMCPMC11982408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.