Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40204799›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Voice biomarkers as prognostic indicators for Parkinson's disease using machine learning techniques.

Ifrah Naeem, Allah Ditta, Tehseen Mazhar, Muhammad Anwar, Mamoon M Saeed, Habib Hamam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ifrah Naeem *Department of Information Sciences, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Allah Ditta *Department of Information Sciences, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan. allahditta@ue.edu.pk.
Tehseen MazharSchool of Computer Science, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan. tehseenmazhar719@gmail.com.
Muhammad AnwarDepartment of Information Sciences, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Mamoon M SaeedDepartment of Communications and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Modern Sciences (UMS), Sana'a, 00967, Yemen. dr.mamoon@ums-edu.com.
Habib HamamFaculty of Engineering, Uni de Moncton, Moncton, NB, E1A3E9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many people suffer from Parkinson's disease globally, a complicated neurological condition caused by the deficiency of dopamine, an organic chemical responsible for regulating movement in individuals. Patients with Parkinson face muscle stiffness or rigidity, tremors, vocal impairment, slow movement, loss of facial expressions, and problems with balance and coordination. As there is no cure for Parkinson, early diagnosis can help prevent the progression of this disease. The study explores the potential of vocal measures as significant indicators for early prediction of Parkinson. Different machine learning models such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Decision Tree (DT) are used to detect Parkinson using voice measures and differentiate between the healthy and Parkinson patients. The dataset contains 195 vocal recordings from 31 patients. The Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) is used for handling class imbalance to improve the performance of the models. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method was used for feature selection. The study uses different parameters to evaluate the model's classification results. The results highlight RF as the most effective model with an accuracy of 94% and a precision of 94%. In addition, SVM achieves an accuracy score of 92%, and precision of 91%. However, with the PCA method, SVM achieves an accuracy of 89%, 92%, and 87% for RF and DT respectively. This study highlights the significance of using vocal features along with advanced machine learning methods to reliably diagnose Parkinson's disease, considering the challenges associated with early detection.

Indexed as

BiomarkersMachine LearningParkinson DiseaseVoiceAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrincipal Component AnalysisPrognosisSupport Vector MachineBiomarkersEarly diagnosisMachine learningPDSMOTEVoice signal

Identifiers

PMID40204799
PMCPMC11982320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.