ArticleNature communications2025
Spatial mechanisms of quality control during chaperone-mediated assembly of the proteasome.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chaperones shape the conformational landscape of 26S-proteasome-base assembly for allosteric ATPase motor activation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Within and beyond the boundaries of proteasomal assembly: PSMD9 chaperone as a multifunctional protein.Essays in biochemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular protein degradation requires a complex molecular machine, the proteasome. To mitigate the fundamental challenge of assembling the 66-subunit proteasome, cells utilize dedicated chaperones to order subunit addition. However, recent evidence suggests that proteasome assembly is not simply a series of subunit additions, but each step may be scrutinized so that only correct assembly events advance to proteasomes. Here, we find an unexpected mechanism of quality control (QC) during proteasome assembly-via the proteasomal nuclear localization signal (NLS). This mechanism specifically sequesters defective assembly intermediates to the nucleus, away from ongoing assembly in the cytoplasm, thereby antagonizing defective proteasome formation. This NLS, a bona fide proteasomal component, provides continuous surveillance throughout proteasome assembly. Even a single incorrect event activates spatial QC. Our findings illuminate a two-decade-old mystery in proteasome regulation; proteasomal NLSs, dispensable for proteasome localization, instead provide QC by compartmentalizing assembly defects to ensure that only correct proteasomes form.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.